Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login

:iconeternalgeekexposed: More from EternalGeekExposed

Featured in Collections

Q__Lit-Pics-Stuff by slashaholic-666

More from DeviantArt


Submitted on
January 25, 2013
File Size
9.0 KB


90 (who?)

A lot of Christians seem to be fond of crying about the oppression they experience in American society. My first response is to laugh, but a lot of these people take themselves very seriously so I feel like I should give them a semi-serious answer to some of the claims I've heard. By "semi-serious", I mean I will include some facts but I will still have a deriding attitude. I can only try so hard. Now usually, I don't like formatting a question-answer session against an imaginary opponent since it seems unfair, but this isn't really an imaginary opponent. All of these statements or questions have been put to me before so, as far as I'm concerned, they are fair game.

"Christianity is becoming endangered."

Honey, this is America. Christians are the vast majority in this country. A 2007 poll places the percentage at 78.4% Christian [1]. The vast majority of our politicians and even our president identifies as Christian. The fact that people were shocked at the possibility of a Mormon president indicates that we are used to a very homogenous religious identity for our Commander in Chief.

Christians are not endangered. Their number might be slowly dropping, but I'd say that's a failure on the part of religious folks, not a hostile secular environment. Maybe if there were better spokespersons for the religion in the spotlight and a better face on the movement people would flock to the churches when bad things happen instead of running away. Passing out tracts isn't going to help that reputation, by the way. You'll have to actually get off of your asses and make a change. Sorry.

"Christians face more discrimination than gays."

Really? You really want to argue that? Let's look at the numbers. According to FBI statistics on hate crimes in 2011, less than 2% of offenses were motivated by anti-protestant or anti-catholic bias [2]. In comparison, 20.8% were motivated by sexual orientation bias. That's 117 incidents against Christians and 1,491 incidents against gays, lesbians, or bisexuals. There were 17 incidents against heterosexuals. Of the incidents against Christians, only 15 were identified as crimes against the individual (assault, intimidation) and there were no murders or rapes. The rest of the incidents were crimes against property (theft, vandalism, etc). In contrast, 1,124 hate crimes comitted against LGB people were crimes against the individual, including 3 murders and 2 rapes. These statistics don't even account for crimes motivated by gender identity bias for which there is no category.

"But that's not-"

Shush. I'm not done yet. You want even more perspective? As horrible as these statistics are, racially-motivated hate crimes dwarf crimes motivated by sexual orientation at 46.9% with 72% of those being against blacks. Religious bias took third seat after sexual orientation with 62.2% of those crimes being comitted against Jewish people and 13.3% comitted against Islamic people. Catholic and Protestant bias put together would make up 8.9% of the religious crimes.

And that is just hate crimes. Consider that, as of 2007, only 20 US states and Washington D. C. prohibitted employment, housing, and private business discrimination on basis of sexuality [3]. I believe that number is 21 states now, but I could not find a reliable source to be certain. Religion and creed is a protected class in every state. Still feeling the discrimination?

"I am. Just try discussing Creationism in the classroom of a major secular university."

Okay, don't claim that Creationism is the same thing as Christianity. There are many Christians that choose to believe modern science and it is insulting to combine Christianity and Creationism as one, as if you can't believe one and not the other. As for your "discrimination", I expect that most modern scientists don't appreciate their class being deviated from a discussion of scientific theory to a discussion of a religious story. You probably wouldn't appreciate it if someone interrupted a church service to talk about how to convert to Wicca. It just isn't that you hate pagans, but it isn't the time or place to discuss it. In the same way, a science teacher is not going to appreciate you interrupting their class to discuss religion.

"But the majority of discrimination isn't reported in the anti-Christian media."

My statistics up there have nothing to do with media. This is the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the laws on the books in your states. Please, find a reputable source if you want to rebut me instead of claiming that the entire media is in the pocket of secular activists. It's not.  We have Fox News.  Case closed.

"Even so, our religious traditions are under attack by organizations like the ACLU."

Listen, your religious traditions should end at the border of your home and your property. No one is going to walk into your home and tell you to stop praying or to take down your tacky light-up Christmas nativity. However, if you want your religion to be the sole one represented in public property, policy, and education, you are going to have to duke it out with our founding fathers. They are the ones that advocated for a government that would not establish a religion, nor prevent the free exercise thereof [4]. Yes, sometimes that means things change and some traditions have to be altered, but change really isn't all that scary once you get to know it. In other words, feel free to worship however you please whenever you please, but don't expect the government advocate it.

"It is more socially accepted to hate Christians than any other group in America."

This statement can't really be discussed factually because it is purely an opinion. It might have some merit, but that's hard to objectively ascertain. I would point out the hate-crime statistics above, but that is only crimes, not actual public opinion. I will agree that there is a lot of bias against Christianity, but I have found most of that bias is against the intolerant, ugly facade that many associate with it, not the actual people. From my personal experience, I've only been treated rudely once for mentioning my religion (and that wasn't even in the USA). On the other hand, my gender has earned me several rude or cruel comments, my sexual orientation has earned me many, and my political ideas have earned me the most. It seems to me that people respond harshly to things that they perceive to be hostile or threatening. So consider this: if you are getting that much hate, maybe you're presenting your religion poorly.

"But what about all of the anti-Christian laws being enacted? Abortion, gay marriage, etc?"

Laws that you disagree with are not discrimination. Being required to abide by laws that everyone else has to abide by is not discrimination. Every citizen dislikes something about the way our country is run. That doesn't mean that they are being discriminated against. Discrimination is unequal treatment, not "thing that I do not like."

"But these laws will make me look like a bigot!"

Maybe you are.

You know, I think the thing that bothers me the most about these people who complain about the discrimination they face as Christians is that there ARE Christians facing persecution in the world. These people probably find the idea of a religiously welcoming society, run by Christians and with a church on every corner amazing! What a wonderful country this must be, where religion is not persecuted, but embraced by the majority of the population!

Oh, but we can't teach Creationism in schools.

I know that the thought of being persecuted must be attractive for Christians at a time when our numbers are dropping. It's much nicer to blame outside factors and secular hostility for the failing and dwindling of religion than to point the finger at ourselves. But honestly, that is dishonest. It is disgustingly, enormously, mind-numbingly dishonest. When innocent Christians in other countries are being persecuted, and when Christians in this country are persecuting innocents, crying over your own discomfort is selfish and pathetic. American Christians are not under attack and they are not persecuted. Stop crying about it. It makes you look like a douche.

Oops, I said a bad word. I'm probably persecuting you.





[4] The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.  Look it up.

Okay, I indulged in some snark here. I'm probably going to get some crap for it, but I couldn't resist. American Christians that fuss about how "persecuted" they are make me laugh and sneer at the same time. I'm aware that there are plenty of people with anti-Christian attitudes or crimes against Christians (that is addressed in this essay) but wide-spread persecution? Don't make me laugh.

As I said above, I don't make a habit of the fake question/answer format because most people who do this try to make the opponent sound like a moron and misrepresent their arguments. However, all of these questions/statements have been put to me in the past, so it's GAME ON, persecuted Christians!

As always, keep it civil, I will block, blah blah. Otherwise, enjoy a chuckle!
Add a Comment:
Maiden-of-Wolves Featured By Owner Sep 17, 2014  Hobbyist General Artist
Thank you so much for this. This 'issue' has irked me ever since I first started seeing it frequently in the news. (Unfortunately my parents watch Fox News... >.> I stick with Daily Kos and the BBC; a sad day was when I realized that the most reliable news on the US actually came from Great Britain...)

I know a handful of christians that are wonderful people and I know that if the majority were like them, there wouldn't be any persecution at all. But, alas, so many more use it as a mask for bigotry and hate.

And then there's the bible itself... I could write a book on the issues with it alone. Particularly when it applies to modern society. I don't know if you know this or not (and I apologize if you do and I'm simply blabbering away) but the famous "turn the other cheek" line from it? In that culture, if you were slapped by their right hand, then turned your cheek -- it would force them to slap you with their left if they wanted to do it again. That was the hand that was considered 'evil' and was used for the sordid things like cleaning up after oneself after eliminating. You simply did not use it against another. It was a very intelligent and pacifistic way of protecting yourself against further attack.

There are many other examples of things that have been taken completely out of context and warped, though I'm sure you know of many of them. Teachings are one thing, but once you begin using them to justify things like slavery, murder, discrimination and bigotry... then we have a problem.
EternalGeekExposed Featured By Owner Sep 19, 2014
You are welcome.  I'm glad that you appreciated it.  I think the issue with the Bible is that people have given it the distinction of being perfect and having ultimate power over every aspect of life.  If any document is given that sort of authority, there are going to end up being a myriad of different possible interpretations, because everyone needs the document to support them in order to consider themselves in the right.  And loads of people will set themselves up as having ultimate knowledge of the document because the document holds the key to power over so many people.  Imagine if a group of people decided that your middle school science text book was the One and Only Document that held All Truth for All Time and was written by god.  People would be falling over themselves to study it.  They would try to decide if different depictions were metaphors for how to live.  Is evolution supposed to be a parallel to the development of civilization?  Is the word "igneous" actually code for something besides rocks?  Is god revealing himself through the descriptions of natural phenomena or is he revealing something about humanity?  Then they would form different sects based on which edition was the right one (especially since newer additions had some changes and clarifications) and there would be traditional "Fun with Science"ists and reformed "Fun with Science"ists and everything in between.  And then you'd have the Physicists and the Biologists that believe that only their portion of the book is the REAL truth.  And even if everything in that book had been completely factually correct and innocent (which cannot be claimed for the bible) the very nature of the SIGNIFICANCE that we gave that book would result in horrible distortions, misconceptions, and divides.

I see the bible, at this point, as just a collection of historical records, stories, myths, and letters.  It is interesting, but there is nothing divinely inspired about it.  Indeed, the moment that we approach it with the opinion that it must be the Ultimate Truth, then we HAVE to distort it.  We will HAVE to distort it to fit our idea of what truth or goodness is, rather than simply viewing it the way we would view any other document.  As such, can we say for sure that Jesus intended for "turning the other cheek" to mean letting yourself get slapped again or trying to find a pacifist way to protect yourself?  That's difficult to say.  Different people will interpret it differently depending on their idea of what they WANT Jesus to have been saying.  In my opinion, there's no way to know, but both possibilities are interesting.
ryu238 Featured By Owner Jun 17, 2014
The part about the ACLU taking away religious freedoms is a joke really:…
Properfessor Featured By Owner Jun 7, 2014  Professional Photographer
Oh for chrissakes
ADE-doodles Featured By Owner Jun 6, 2014  Professional General Artist
I'd agree that "persecution" is not the word to use with respect to most Christians. Many Churches are in contact with Christians around the world where serious persecution has and is going
In the west, When it come to Psyical attacks and many aspects of life, it's just not there ... yet. But i can name  incidents where Christians have been attacked physically for their beliefs in the west, often it's in a political context.  But it's really not that wide spread.

But when you go beyond the physical aspects and the word is understood in a more social, political and metaphorical context. the term begins to have more reality.

All of you "admissions" show, at nearly each point, that you justify the treatment. after you belittle or minimize the complaint.  It seems your saying it's a forgone conclusion that people should be getting ugly push back for their Christian opinions.
•They shouldn't have those opinions, they should keep it their homes and not try to influence others,
•They just have to obey the laws that force them to do things against their faith,
•Social put downs of Christians only count if it's personal, the media's constant attacks on various aspects of Christianity, radio-TV-shows, universities, attempts to shut down peoples careers and businesses if they don't agree with certain views ....well i won't comment on that and it just opinion anyway, plus it's probably deserved,
•By default we all know that no aspects of creation is science (and it's not even really a part of Christianity (?)) and nothing a science teacher ever says to your children should be challenged in anyway so your trouble here is justified.

it Seems like your telling Some Christians,
"it's not that bad, just change your views and actions and you won't have any trouble anyway."

the fact is that in the country Christians In general enjoy tremendous freedom as do those of all other faiths. And in many areas of social life Christianity,  in general, is embraced. but it use to be MUCH moreso. There were no taboos or outrage against any traditional christian doctrines. Most aspects of Christianity were accepted by default generally true.

But today those that have the the loudest voices and have the most influential positions in media, gov't and education are AGAINST large sections of clear Christian/Biblical thought and practice.

And those against those aspects of Christianity see little problem with tearing down the rest or trying to. And assume that Christians should get rid of the "bad" parts. By their definition of course.  just do what everyone else does... or else.

Many people are sensitive to verbal attacks or portrayals that are offensive to, Buddism, Islam, Jews, Minorities, homosexuals,  they should not have to be offended.
But honestly when they last time you heard anyone seriously care if a Christian was offended?

Everyone in the west is suppose to promote free speech and people can cuss, make the rudest jokes, put on shows, music, display art that says the harshest most vile things, publicly make veiled threats against Christians even "not enough lions" all in good fun i guess? But if a Christian quotes a Bible verse they are, by default, considered a bigot, hate filled,  dangerous, should be tried for "hate speech, and her business or career shut down until they conform and/or recant.

Maybe "persecution" is a hyperbolic a term, I'd give you that, but to claim that there's NO real issue here is a dismissive lie.

EternalGeekExposed Featured By Owner Jun 6, 2014
Most people who aren't zealots aren't seriously concerned if a Christian is offended because Christians are still the majority in this country and still hold the majority of the power and thus offense against Christians has very little practical effect.  The same cannot be said for other groups that are minorities and have to struggle daily to overcome legal, social, and physical barriers erected by Christians in order to live their lives.  And, by the way, most Christian Bible verses are completely okay to quote.  People quote Bible verses all the time with no problem.  If you want to quote a verse that marginalizes or insults a minority and disfavored group (like quoting a verse that promotes the death penalty on homosexuals or tells women that they are inferior) then YES you should be treated disdainfully... just like anyone else, religious or not, who uses their personal beliefs to treat another group shamefully.  Sure, this can happen to Christians, but most often, it occurs FROM Christians against minorities, because Christians are still the vast, vast, vast majority in this country.  Just look at the HARD FACT statistics I offered.  As such, I find it a little laughable that some Christians seem to think that they are being persecuted in the US.

Yes, Christian beliefs used to be mostly unquestioned.  That is NOT a good thing.  Would you like to live in a society where only one system of beliefs are accepted and completely unquestioned if you didn't happen to hold those beliefs?  I don't think so.  The rest of us feel the same way about your supposed eutopia of Christiandom.

The United States doesn't accept your views as absolutely perfect and wonderful anymore.  No one has to change their views if they don't want to.  All you have to do is accept that you live in a nation where your views aren't the ONLY views that are accepted.  I think a lot of Christians have a problem with this idea and want to call it "persecution" despite the fact that Christians have historically (and still are) persecutors.  If you are willing to accept that your views aren't the only ones that are and SHOULD be accepted, then we have no problem.  If you can't accept that... well, I'm glad that you will be left behind as the world moves forward.

By the way, your claims that there was NO taboo against Christian doctrine or beliefs in the past is hilariously inaccurate.  In early colonial America, Catholics were strongly persecuted by Protestants, having their civil rights restricted, suffering banishment from Puritan colonies, and even being hanged.  After the US became independent , there were still laws that prevented Catholics from holding office in some states without renouncing the Pope.  Anti-catholic sentiment continued to brew, even after religious tests were barred by the founding fathers.  Anti-baptist sentiment was also strong, resulting in many assaults and vicious persecution by Anglicans in some areas.  Discrimination was not uncommon.  This continued with the massacre and expulsion of Mormons in the 1800's as Christians refused to accept the new school of Christian thought.  In other words, at NO point in our history was there a wonderful period of "no taboo against Christian doctrine".  There were ALWAYS taboos... it just depended on which particular doctrine was in favor.
ADE-doodles Featured By Owner Jun 6, 2014  Professional General Artist
"..Most people who aren't zealots aren't seriously concerned if a Christian is offended because Christians are still the majority in this country..."

sooooo it's OK to be offensive willy nilly…. to a majority group?
 Seems to me a better view is to be kind and respectful to everyone.
Am i wrong here?

"...and thus offense against Christians has very little practical effect..."

What "practical" effect are you looking for by being offensive?
Again it seems to me that your justifying being offensive to Christians , and not only that but using it as a tool for… what?

You say others have to struggle under oppression , but a Christian who's business is attacked because he's trying to obey his faith is NOT under attack? is not in a struggle? And your willing to "...leave her behind..." because you don't like their beliefs?  You want them to change their beliefs or  "be left behind" socially and legally. Do you want Jews to be left behind if they don't do what you like?
Double standard much? It doesn't sound like your looking for equity or peaceful coexistence but a country where the oppression of certain Christian beliefs and people is the status quo.

am i overstating the case?

As far a majority vs minority go. while in many cases numbers do matter, power ins't always found in the numbers. Apartheid in South africa was a minority rule state. where the majority were opposed by a small group in power. there are other examples of the same around the world and through history.

Concerning Christian beliefs being a good or bad thing. I say it's a great thing, it's why you even have a vision of EQUAL rights (skewed as it may be). In the west equal rights and Human rights is a Christian concept. Most of the good values in western democracy come from Christian beliefs worked out into law.
Slavery was beaten in England by a 20+ year steadfast dedication of Wilberforce and crew, devout Christians. The anti slavery movements in the US were started and fueled by Christians not secularist. The underground railroad was made up of devout Quakers, Baptist etc..  John Brown a crazy Christian. Equal rights for women was spearheaded by Quaker women Lucreia Mott and Susan B. Anthony.  The 1st Progressive movement in the U.S. was Christian based. Martian luther King promoted equality and civil rights among races, other virtues because of the Bible's clear teaching of the equality of Humanity. The Red CROSS, the Salvation Army, the YMChristian'sA, Catholic and Protestant hospitals around the globe.  If your going to honest, all that hate against historical Christian wrongs in pass has to be set against the far weightier good planted by Christian ideals and actions. You mentioned the Catholics troubles here in the Us. In Europe there were wars over the Christian faith at times but Christians are the ones that realized the clear Bible teaching and codified the idea that God gave humans have a right to believe based on their own conscious and NOT be FORCE to believe or not to believe certain views. It was the clear teaching of Christ from the beginning.

While in contrast, when the ideals of equality are un-tied from the christian moral base and the Bible you end up with a French Revolution, a Communist Russia and Maoist China. Each were some people are considered more equal than others, to the point of killing off whole groups for the good of the state.

lastly i guess, your comments on which Bible verses Christians can or cannot say should clearly show you how you really want to MUZZLE free religious speech. Much like the people you complain about who ran off the Mormons and Catholics. Tell me whats the real difference?  

There are NO Christians advocating the killing of homosexuals. But i can find people commenting on this page that are advocating killing Christians. the Bible also says heterosexual Adulterers should be stoned? in your world, are we allowed to quote that verse? You may want to hear only the worse possible motives behind every Christian that reads a verse aloud, but I pray we don't replace the mild .. yes mild.. pressure against non Christians .. (who still have more freedom here than a lot of places on earth) with the full on religious oppression i think i hear you advocating under your breath.

You didn't address the real pressures coming against Christian in your response, again you justified them, under the banners of "progress", your version of real equality and the idea that it's OK to oppress the "majority".

Of course you think your right, but don't we all? it doesn't mean we get to treat other like crap. at least that's what my Bible tells me.
EternalGeekExposed Featured By Owner Jun 6, 2014
I never said it's okay to be offensive to any group.  I did say that offense to different groups has different consequences.  I don't support being an asshole to anyone.  But it's worth recognizing the inherent power differences in our society... especially when the group in power wants to silence the group out of power by claiming THEY are the victims.  It's worthwhile to call bullshit on that.

By the way, if certain Christian beliefs result in the oppression of other people then yes, I do believe they should be left behind, legally and socially.  That's why we no longer allow slavery.  There were Christians on both sides of that issue, and there still are.  But we've decided that those who supported it with their beliefs were wrong and we have left that behind.

I never was interested in debating whether Christians are good or bad.  They can be both.  You say there is more good than bad.  I say it's probably equal.  Billions of lives have been lost in the name of Christianity and many saved as well.  It is of no consequence to me whether Christianity is "good" or "bad" because I have no interest in outlawing it or anything of the sort.

I am not muzzling any free speech... you pulled that out of your ass.  I think everyone should be welcome to say whatever disgusting bigotry they want, so long as it doesn't cross legal boundaries (such as viable personal threats or blackmail).  There should be no legal barriers to that.  That doesn't mean that society shouldn't reprimand and reject bigotry.  We generally consider it unacceptable to consider blacks inferior to whites.  It's not illegal to believe they are or even to say it.  But such people are generally considered unacceptable.  That is not muzzling free speech.  Please read the 1st Amendment if you don't believe me.

"There are NO Christians advocating the killing of homosexuals"  That is just the most mind-boggling lie.  Jesus had something to say about lying, you know.  I have actually had my own Christian cousin threaten to kill homosexuals (followed by many other Christians backing him up and talking about "letting them kneel and pray if they want to and then shooting them execution-style").  Christians in Uganda are killing homosexuals.  Parents have killed homosexual children.  Christian leaders have advocated for the killing of homsexuals.  Your claim is so laughably false I don't even know where to start with it.  MOST Christians don't advocate for the killing of homosexuals, but there are plenty who still do.  To claim otherwise is disgusting and a lie.

I have no interest in causing Christians problems, so long as they don't cause anyone else problems either. I like religion.  I have absolutely no problem with people being religious.  But right now, Christians are legally, politically, socially in power, and as such, calling them "persecuted" is disingenuous.  The fact that you have to resort to such blatant falsehoods as "you are muzzling free speech" and "no Christians advocate killing homosexuals" to try to argue this is just pathetic.

Finally, you have repeatedly made assumptions about my position that are simply not true.  I do not advocate for oppression of religion, removal of free speech, or treating Christians like assholes.  I'm very pro-religion and also pro-atheism and really pro-everything that doesn't hurt people.  If a religion requires you to hurt people, well I'm sorry, but you're allowed to believe it but that doesn't give you a right to hurt people.  That's how freedom of religion works.
ADE-doodles Featured By Owner Jun 7, 2014  Professional General Artist
In my 1st reply i mentioned that the word "persecution" might be hyberbolic at this point. but i went on to say that there r however  real issues and some christians have felt oppressed for and lost jobs, businesses  etc for holding onto their beliefs.

In both of your replies now you've not acknowledge any serious harm done to ANY Christians while in both replies you've pointed to issues you suffered personally as significant. Look I'm sorry that you've been through that. I have no problem agreeing with you that you've had to deal with some idiots that claim religion to back up their BS. But you can't seem to acknowledge that treating Christians badly because they believe and promote the Bible has been real problem for anyone.

In both replies you allow for it, and say it's deserved for some.
So how's that really that different from what your condemning?

As I said I do not support and No Christians who's following the Bible supports oppressing, threatening, hurting or killing homosexuals. To be consistent they'd have to do the same to the heterosexual adulterers and others as well. But even then they'd have the Biblical check Of Jesus's and Paul's words to forgive, and help those that have fallen NOT to KILL or threaten.

 As you mentioned Some minority who say they are Christians sadly advocate harm of people but that's MORE sinful than the sin they think they are correcting. As you said MOST christians do not support that type of thing. I've been a christian for some time and I've never heard a popular Christian leader (expect for the nut that went around the country) call for  attacks on or the killing of Homosexuals. pat Robinson? No. James Dobson? No.  Jerry Falwell? No, Billy Graham? No, Joel Olsten? No, James Roberston? no, T.D Jakes, No. Those are some of the most well known but i can personally Name at least 40-50 nationally known preachers in conservative and pentecostal circles, not to mention Catholic, that have nationwide or international Christian audiences with television and or radio ministries. WHO'VE NEVER advodted violence or harm of ANY kind in 25 + years. However some of them have had their worked censored for simply saying what the Bible says, ...marriage is for men and women only... and that homosexuality is a sin.
But whens the last time you've heard ANYTHING other than a stand for traditional marriage being proposed by any legit Christians leaders in the U.S.?  It's Clearly part of the faith. Some homosexuals have decided... in the last 30 years... that now somehow it's the hieght of all evil and bigotry for Christians to agree with Jesus that a Man and Woman should be the only ones that marry.
I've talked to enough homosexual marriage advocates to know that they are generally unwilling to see it from any perspective but their own. And they've labeled it bigotry rather than what it is, simple adherence to the faith.
The same faith that says "Don't lie." which you just encourage me not to do. Are you a Bigot for telling me to obey the Bible? Why do you get to decide what part is the "good part" of Christianity. especially when homosexuality is never described as good.

It's always a odd to hear folks from your prespective encouraging others not to lie, not to kill, to be loving, because the Bible or God says so but when we want to obey God in the area of supporting traditional marriage we've suddenly become fanatical bigots, no better than the klansmen who should be shunned and outliers in the community. But in your mind that's the RIGHT thing to do. and is NOT really to be considered "persecution".

Christians have tried very hard gently (and not so gently) point out that homosexual acts are simply sin as is adultery or lying or stealing or gossip even. And Christians cannot in good faith support any of those things. Much less celebrate them. Are those sins "normal"? well Lying is "normal", but it doesn't make it right. Is it bigotry to say lying is wrong?

in some peoples minds it is. and there's the impasse.
2 different perspectives that cannot seem to be bridged. Frankly if you and others say we HAVE to change our Biblical opinions or else be marginalized.
...Well... Christians around the world have had to deal with that since the beginning. you say your pro Christianity, I hope you'll consider that many/most Christians do not want to "oppress" or hurt ANYONE. we just want to live in peace and be free ---in love and truth--- to tell people that we all are sinners. and we all need to RUN from our sins into God arms who knows the whole story, and loves and forgives all unrighteousness through Jesus's sacrificial death and his Resurrection.

The story of Jesus with the woman caught in adultery is the model, I think, is right for Christians approach to sin . The woman was about to be stoned because adultery is Sin. But Jesus said

"Let he who is without sin throw the 1st stone". ..
And everyone starting from the oldest dropped their stones and left.
 the rest of the story which is often left off says
Jesus asked the women "who are they that condemn you?"
She replied. "No one LORD."
Jesus said "Neither do i condemn you. Go and sin no more."

Jesus still flatly calls the act sin, A sin he wants her to completely abandon. But he's not advocating violence against anyone.

But maybe Jesus was a hateful bigot.
EternalGeekExposed Featured By Owner Jun 7, 2014
Alright, I think the confusion we're having here with our viewpoints is this: you think that Christians should be able to dictate what other people get to do with their lives if that's a part of their faith.  I disagree.  Take the idea of marriage equality, for example.  If you believe that marriage is between a man and a woman, fine.  I don't care.  If you don't want to marry same sex couples in your church, I don't care.  I have never met another gay person who cares about that!  The problem is when you want to tell me that your personal belief about RELIGIOUS marriage gets to dictate whether or not I get to have my SECULAR marriage.  Religious and secular marriage as NOT the same thing.  I had to limit my options of where I could apply to graduate school because I was not willing to live in a state where my marriage would not be recognized.  The reason is that I would have no legal protections for my family if my wife and I chose to adopt a kid.  My family is very hateful towards my wife for marrying me, and if I were to die, I fear that they would try to take our child away from her.  Is that fair?  Is it acceptable for me to not even have a CHANCE to access the rights and protections that you already have?  Is it okay for my child to be unprotected from having the only parents he/she has ever known taken away?  How about the fact that, if I'm in a state where my marriage is not legally recognized, I can't make medical decisions or even be in the same room as my injured partner if something were to happen and she were unconscious?  How about the fact that, to get this legal protection, I would have to pay anywhere from hundreds of dollars to ten thousand dollars to try to get documents written (which my wife and I don't have right now)?

Oh I see.  It's a "simple adherence to faith" to tell me that I'm not allowed to access the same rights as you.  Lovely.

Now, how about I mention some other things that some Christians seem to want the laws to dictate?  As I said, I can be fired from my job, evicted from my apartment, and kicked out of a business for being gay.  As a Christian, you CANNOT be treated this way because religion is a protected class.  This doesn't mean that you can't be kicked out/fired/evicted for making a nuisance of yourself, just like anyone else, but it can't happen simply because someone finds out you are a Christian.  I DO NOT HAVE THAT PROTECTION largely because Christians want to have the right to discriminate against me.  Is that good?  Is that fair?  Is it good that I was afraid to make friends with any of my co-workers for the first 2 months of a new job because I wasn't sure if I dared mention in their conversations about their wives and husbands that I was getting engaged?  Would I have to make up a male name for her?  Would I accidentally slip up on pronouns at some point and give myself away?  Was this job a safe place for me, or might my job be in jeopardy?  How about our apartment... should we go together to see the place we wanted to rent, or would that result in getting denied if we seemed too much like a couple?

By the way, I wouldn't uphold Pat Robertson as a good example of someone who has not advocated violence against gays.  While I am not aware of any time that he outright said "go hurt someone who is gay", he has told people that gays are going to cause (and have caused) terrorist bombings, earthquakes, and will eventually maybe cause a meteor to wipe out the entire country, and also said that gay people wear special rings that they use to infect innocent people with AIDS through a handshake.  So he is certainly contributing to hate and abuse of homosexuals by Christians by telling Christians that their very lives are threatened by gays.  Can you not see how that is a problem?  Oh, and Pat Robertson did actually advocate for assassinating someone (not a gay person) so I can't say he hasn't called for killing either.  Oh, and how about James Dobson, who you mentioned, who blamed the Sandy Hook shooting on gays?  And also said "homosexuals will destroy the earth?"  How is that not inciting hatred and feeding violence?  For some other examples, consider the pastor that told his congregation that if a child was seen "dropping a limp wrist" you should "snap that wrist?"  Or consider on the extreme end, Scott Lively, the US pastor who is credited with bringing about Uganda's "Kill the Gays" law, by going overseas and telling the faith communities there that all gay people are pedophiles, killers, and intrinsically evil and must be removed permanently from society?

Now, these people are certainly in the minority and I don't think the majority of Christians would necessarily agree with them (although a LOT more do than I like to believe).  I'm also not saying that someone is not allowed to have these beliefs or even voice them.  However, it is my hope that the decent people of society (Christian and non-Christian alike) are starting to realize that these sentiments and the idea of barring people from legal rights is NOT acceptable, regardless of the religious beliefs of the person advocating this.  As such, people who tell horrific lies about a marginalized group of people, who advocate for trampling on their rights, and who want to make their lives miserable will hopefully be left behind by society, just like we are trying to leave racists and xenophobes and neo-nazi's behind.

If you believe that your brand of Christianity supports marriage as being between a man and a woman, I really don't care.  I don't.  Most gay people don't.  But there are other Christians (YES there are lots of Christian leaders that support gay rights and marriage) and non-Christians who support same-sex marriage.  They should be allowed to marry the same sex, just as you are allowed to marry in the way that seems right to you.  No one is forcing you to change your beliefs or forcing your church to change their doctrine.  We just want the right that you already have: to live our lives the way we see fit while hurting NO ONE in the process.  If your group of Chrisitans can't accept that, then I hope that society will soon leave them in the dust.
Add a Comment: